Alexander Wants to Avoid Red Herring

Denis Alexander has expressed his concern that the evolution debate could turn into a significant distraction. In his book Creation or Evolution he writes, "Christian campaigns against evolution represent a giant 'red herring', distracting believers from far more important pursuits. We are faced with a huge challenge of reaching a lost world with the message of the gospel. Why not take all that money, energy and human gifting and abilities, and use them for evangelism?" Alexander's point about the gospel's pre-eminence is well made.

However, as one who has committed my life to the proclamation of the gospel and who has travelled to many nations of the world to pursue that I find it a little hard to reconcile Alexander's concern with his current 'campaign'. I have never campaigned against evolution until now. The incessant onslaught by Alexander, Spencer, Theos and the Faraday Institute to persuade me to concur with their convictions has caused me to question the "evidence" for evolution and the theology Alexander invites me to embrace. If I adopt Alexander's suggested theology, then the fall has made little material difference to the world, sin (whatever that is) is not the cause of death, death is apparently God's chosen means of developing life, I have no idea then why Christ had to die and I am not exactly sure in what way he is my Saviour. Under this theology evangelism loses clarity and purpose.

What about the energy, human gifting and abilities and the significant amount of money that has been put into commissioning a play, two major independent research studies, writing etc. that make up the Rescuing Darwin project. Why didn't Alexander direct all this into evangelism and world poverty? Instead he started a campaign and then criticised those of a different view with the following words, "Christians who make it their mission to attack evolution...are embarrassing and bring the gospel into disrepute." At least he and Nick Spencer have stated their desire that the debate would be carried out in a spirit of courtesy and mutual respect! (see Rescuing Darwin p10).

Comments  

 
#4 RE: Alexander Wants to Avoid Red HerringPeter 2010-01-18 14:10
Samuel - may I suggest that you read Denis Sewell's "The Political Gene"? 2009. He says p xii - "A second line of my enquiry has been to seek to establish how robust the links really were between what Charles Darwin actually wrote or said, and what others, claiming to sail under Darwin's flag, carried into the social and political domain. I have been surprised, sometimes even shocked, to discover that in some sensitive areas the connections are rather stronger than I had expected them to be. When I began writing this book I was aware that many people regarded scientific racialism and eugenics as wholly unwarranted extrapolations from Darwin's thought, and effectively nothing to do with Darwin. I had intended to take an impartial approach, holding that view in balance with its opposite. I have come to the conclusion, however, that it is a false view..." You may care to do more research and then revise your assertions to bring them into line with historic data.
 
 
#3 Mr.Samuel Vaiphei 2010-01-13 17:28
Wref to "The incessant onslaught by Alexander, Spencer, Theos and the Faraday Institute to persuade me to concur with their convictions has caused me to question the "evidence" for evolution and the theology Alexander invites me to embrace."

I wonder if you'd been sleeping all along. People like Denis Alexander, Francis Collins, Darrel Falk etc came up because of the onslaught by Philip Johnson and his proteges in the '90s. Prior to Philip we have had Morris & Whitcomb (@'60s-80s)with their present day heirs in the person of Ken Ham, Jonathan Sarfati & co still trying to convince the world evolution is satanic.
 
 
#2 I have to disagreeEd 2009-12-28 13:54
Thanks for your observations Diogo. I would be pleased to give you space on this site to explain a theology of why Jesus died that is compatible with Dr Alexander's position. The purpose of the site is to allow discussion.

The Rescuing Darwin project made no attempt to stay within science. The primary distribution of the book was through Bible Society to 20,000 church leaders???
 
 
#1 I have to disagree...Diogo Kyrillos 2009-12-16 07:45
Well, even after reading "Creation or Evolution", I know exactly why Jesus died and I don't think this book in any way changed my view about that. Regarding death (the three types of it) and sin, by your comment it seems you didn't get the point presented in the book.

As Dr. Alexander is a scientist, I see know problem in the Rescuing Darwin project, as long as it stays in the scientific field, of course.
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Infomation

Book Price: £9.99
Paperback 192 pages
ISBN 9781844744060
Published 20/11/2009

Edited by
Norman C. Nevin
Foreword by
Wayne Grudem

Latest Comments

RSS